This review contains affiliate links. We earn a commission if you sign up with a provider through our links, at no extra cost to you. It has no bearing on how we evaluate or rank providers — see our full disclosure policy.

Dermatology has one of the longest specialist wait times in medicine — a routine appointment can mean weeks on a calendar, longer in areas with fewer dermatologists. Teledermatology exists specifically to shorten that gap, and for a meaningful share of skin conditions, it does the job about as well as sitting in an exam room. For others, it's a useful first step that still ends with an in-person visit.

Here's the honest version of which is which.

The two models, briefly

Some platforms now use a hybrid of both — photos submitted in advance, reviewed before a live call — which tends to produce the most thorough visits, since the dermatologist walks in already having seen the images rather than examining cold over a webcam.

What translates well to video

82% of teledermatology patients report being satisfied with the visit
~27% say they'd replace all their in-person dermatology visits with virtual ones
$81 average per-visit savings found across systematic review data on virtual dermatology consults

That gap between 82% satisfaction and 27% full replacement is the honest summary of teledermatology's place in care: people like it, and most still want some in-person dermatology relationship too. It's a complement, not a full substitute.

What still needs an in-person visit

Anything requiring a biopsy. A dermatologist can flag a concerning mole over video, but removing tissue for pathology requires being in the room.

Procedures — cryotherapy, excisions, Mohs surgery. These are hands-on by definition, and telehealth follow-ups for them often fall outside what's separately billable anyway.

Full-body skin cancer screenings. A dermatologist examining a small number of submitted photos isn't the same as a systematic head-to-toe exam looking for something you didn't know to photograph.

One clinical nuance worth knowing

Research on teledermatology for acne has flagged a specific caution: isotretinoin, a common and effective but higher-risk acne medication, has less safety and efficacy data specifically for telehealth-based prescribing in female patients, given monitoring requirements around pregnancy prevention. If isotretinoin is part of your treatment plan, an in-person component is often appropriate even if the rest of your care happens virtually.

Good teledermatology doesn't try to replace your dermatologist. It tries to get you seen faster for the 70–80% of visits that don't actually need a physical exam.

How to get a useful teledermatology visit

Providers offering dermatology access

The provider below offers a broader telehealth footprint that includes skin conditions alongside its other specialties.

Reviewed providers

Where to start for a virtual skin visit

Sesame Care Multi-specialty marketplace

Sesame's provider marketplace includes board-certified dermatologists alongside its other specialties, with transparent per-visit pricing rather than a subscription commitment.

See Sesame Care's providers →

The bottom line

Teledermatology is genuinely useful for the majority of what actually walks into a dermatology office — acne, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, refills, and initial triage. It's not a replacement for a hands-on exam when one is actually needed, and a good platform will tell you that directly rather than trying to handle everything over video regardless of fit.